Talk:Antioch of Pisidia
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Antioch of Pisidia article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Comments
[edit]Cut and paste
[edit]This article has all the hallmarks of a cut and paste job. The question is: where from ? -- Derek Ross | Talk
- I agree. Any idea where it is from? --Timc 03:30, 6 Jun 2004 (UTC)
- Seems to be from http://encyclopedia.thefreedictionary.com/Pisidian%20antioch If I understood correctly there are no compyright problems, but correct me if I'm wrong. I started adding internal links to the article, but run out of time and patience. I'll continue later if the job is still unfinished. --Chino 10:14, 2 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- I don't think it's from there. Note the tiny text near the bottom which says...
- This article was derived fully or in part from an article on Wikipedia.org - the free encyclopedia created and edited by online user community. The text was not checked or edited by anyone on our staff. Although the vast majority of the wikipedia encyclopedia articles provide accurate and timely information please do not assume the accuracy of any particular article. This article is distributed under the terms of GNU Free Documentation License.
- ...and proves that encyclopedia.thefreedictionary.com got it from us. -- Derek Ross | Talk 23:27, 2004 Nov 4 (UTC)
- But it still looks like a cut'n paste. Well, if we can't find any copyright holder we might as well keep it. --Chino 09:57, 12 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Who wrote this?
This article was studied and prepared by me, Director of Yalvac Museum. And freeecyclopedia used my article, after I wrote it. I aimed to prepare a compact, easy-understandable hand-guide for visitors in my first year in Antioch. And you right, it is partly a copy-paste work. I used many topics from S. Mitchell's book which is the only correct scientific work for the site. But the concept of explaining the site is mine. Best. Ünal Demirer Archaeologist demirerunal@gmail.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.248.12.58 (talk) 19:47, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
Too long?
[edit]One editor has commented that the article is too long. It is 18 printed pages. Maybe the descriptions of the individual buildings could be tersely summarized and forked? Student7 00:28, 6 November 2007 (UTC)