Talk:Chakra

Please place new discussions at the bottom of the talk page.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Chakra article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is written in Indian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, analysed, defence) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Hinduism: Philosophy Top‑importance

	Hinduism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hinduism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hinduism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HinduismWikipedia:WikiProject HinduismTemplate:WikiProject HinduismHinduism
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Philosophy task force (assessed as Top-importance).

Buddhism High‑importance

	This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Buddhism, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing with Buddhism. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page for more details on the projects.BuddhismWikipedia:WikiProject BuddhismTemplate:WikiProject BuddhismBuddhism
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Religion: New religious movements Mid‑importance

	Religion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by New religious movements work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Yoga High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Yoga, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Yoga, Hatha yoga, Yoga as exercise and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YogaWikipedia:WikiProject YogaTemplate:WikiProject YogaYoga
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Spirituality High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spirituality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spirituality-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpiritualityWikipedia:WikiProject SpiritualityTemplate:WikiProject SpiritualitySpirituality
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Occult Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Occult, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to the occult on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OccultWikipedia:WikiProject OccultTemplate:WikiProject OccultOccult
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Alternative views High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alternative views, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of significant alternative views in every field, from the sciences to the humanities. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion.Alternative viewsWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative viewsTemplate:WikiProject Alternative viewsAlternative views
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Skepticism High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.

Archives

Archive 1

Archive 2

This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by .

Chakras are now the biggest focus of charlatans

The following link from a recognized and qualified Sanskrit scholar, exposes what every practitioner of Tibetan Buddhist and Hindu Tantra already knows - that the chakras are a visualisation - not an existing subtle structure. All the early texts cited in the History section state this. The idea of chakras being actual structures only dates from the modern era.

http://hareesh.org/blog/2016/2/5/the-real-story-on-the-chakras

As with most of my "Talk" posts, this is in Talk, because there are so many people with personal self-interest in chakras being descriptive, that my post would quickly be removed. 162.205.217.211 (talk) 02:51, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may very well be right. Good luck, though; there's so much overlap between colourful "healing" rituals and theatre, I doubt anyone could impose regulations on such concepts without being accused of trampling on freedom-of-expression and/or -religion rights. Let's face it: In a free society, people are allowed to delude themselves however they wish—and they do.

Personally, I'd be much more concerned about creepy, wealth-obsessed sociopaths convincing vast hoardes of undereducated voters that they give two cents about anyone's interests but their own. But I digress, probably. – AndyFielding (talk) 20:45, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, sorry, those were both me. I forgot to re-indent after the linebreak—and for some odd reason, WP's mobile editor doesn't let us edit our own Talk posts. ("Wikipedia, the Talk pages no one can edit—at least on a phone." LOL) – AndyFielding (talk) 20:49, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You can, actually, just select 'View as Wikipedia page' and you suddenly get edit links to every talk thread. Daft as a brush but it works. Chiswick Chap (talk) 06:06, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Number of Chakras section

"Ayurveda (3): In Ayurveda, there are three main chakras, known as the "Marmas," which are considered to be the focal points of the physical, mental, and spiritual energies in the body."

No. Ayurveda there are 108 marma points. They are not chakras. Not same. Chakra means wheel.

There are 3 doshas in body. Different.

~~Ted~~ 2607:FEA8:483:8E00:ED1D:6B67:7F3E:14B1 (talk) 09:50, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sceptic section

The sceptical section refers to a website that is self-published and doesn't even list the "shaky" research. Can't we do better than [1]https://www.edinburghskeptics.co.uk/skepdayJan/Chakras for a sceptical note? In the mean time, I'm tempted to delete this section for not being based on a reliable source. PizzaMan ♨♨♨ 21:54, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This article, while itself not a great source, does sum up the research there is on chakras. PizzaMan ♨♨♨ 22:08, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Rewrite of some sections (content is all fine)

There are some sections (especially towards the bottom) that I think need a rewrite. Grammatically they are sketchy at best and either way do not have an encyclopedic tone. I don’t intend to outright change any information or content but if I could get a second opinion on the Chakra#Buddhist tantra section’s state before I do a rewrite that would be ideal. OverzealousAutocorrect (talk) 19:36, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That section seems pretty good, barring a small amount that's not cited. Chiswick Chap (talk) 08:29, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]